1.
A few years ago—at least three—I was talking to a friend who
said he felt great embarrassment about his past: the things he used to say, the
things he used to believe, the person he used to be. He felt uncomfortable running
into people he met back then, because it always reminded him of that gap. Even
though I had changed a lot, I couldn’t say I shared the feeling. I felt
comfortable attributing my foolishness to youth; that is the price of maturing.
I am taking a course in social media as part of my last term
in university. It’s been an interesting course; we’ve discussed
identity-creation through social media, the role Twitter plays in professional
discourse, and the similarities between content curation and library curation.
At the beginning of class we were asked to give a brief history of our social
media use. I mentioned Facebook and Tumblr, of course; I mentioned the research
I’m doing on YouTube comments; I mentioned my defunct DeviantArt and Flickr
accounts. I also mentioned that I had a blog for a long time and frequented the
comments of some blogs, since that was relevant to the course blogs and course
discussion board components of the class. I did not, however, share the link.
To my knowledge, exactly one person who I met in Vancouver knows this blog
exists.
In a management course I took in the second term of this
program, the instructor spoke with us about job interviews. What sorts of
things might make an interviewer think twice about hiring you? Pregnancy?
Partying? Strong and … specific political opinions? Should you mention these
things on your Facebook profile? Whether or not employers should check candidates’ Facebook profiles, they do; they also
Google candidates’ names. Of course, one of the other things that might make an
interviewer think twice is a history with mental illness.
Last night I was reading posts in which bloggers reveal the
search terms that brought the most people to their blog. Of course, as with my
own, the terms are largely
pornographic. So I decided to check my current stats and see what search
terms bring people in. Planarians are a common theme, including at least two
people who wanted to know if cutting a planarian in half hurts it. (I don’t
know for sure, but I’m going to have to go with yes.) Sidney’s sonnets have
been replaced by Addison’s essay on wit for the subject of undergraduate
plagiarism. No one looks for Disney songs in church more than a few times a
month, but that’s still keeping regular. One search string in particular caught
my attention: “christian h full name thinking grounds.”
2.
I assume you’re getting a sense of where this is going.
The gap between myself and “Christian H,” as a particular
construct or persona or avatar, has long been tenuous. The first time I ever
got something published, I mentioned it here; the first time I worked on an
online project for an employer, with my name attached, I also mentioned it
here. From then on, anonymity was only likely; a person could in theory get
from this blog to my real name if they tried hard enough.
In the meantime, though, I’ve published other things, and I
did not mention them. A big part of this silence is that I’m actually more
concerned about people getting from my real name to this blog than the other
way around. Googling my full name does not yet get you to this blog (within the
number of pages that most people are willing to look through). If I mentioned a
publication, there’d be another search term. What I felt in the first anecdote
is no longer true: I am plenty embarrassed
by this blog’s archives. Maybe I shouldn’t be embarrassed; it’s nearly a truism
that all writers hate their older work. But I am. I won’t talk much about it;
the most important things, I think, are that I realize that I was unfair,
defensive, and blind to my own privileges.
When I first started blogging about depression, I spent a
lot of time thinking about whether I wanted to do so. I knew that my anonymity
was precarious at best. As I framed it
to myself, my choice was between blogging about depression and no longer
blogging at all, maybe even to the point of burying the Thinking Grounds, if I
could. I’ve been unsure about this blog for a while, but it offers a chance to
think in a particular way about things; I value this way of thinking. So the
only way I’d keep blogging was if I could use it to think about depression. You
know what I chose.
But I am headed for the job market in less than a month. I
even made a LinkedIn account! Soon I will be co-presenting a paper at a major
conference. While the novel I’m currently writing will probably never see the
light of day, I am sending out poems
and short stories, and someone may publish one of them sometime or another.
Furthermore, I have a few ideas for novels to write after the one I’m writing
now; one of those might go somewhere. I hope one of them does. Don’t get me
wrong: I doubt I’ll be a quote-unquote public figure in the near future, and I
may never be one at all. But I need to start worrying a lot more about online
reputation.
3.
What does this mean?
First, over the next few weeks, I will be combing the
archives and taking down those posts which I think I really need to take down.
There are a few places where I think I was pretty unprofessional. Mostly I
disapprove of taking down posts to prevent embarrassment, but in a few cases I
think it’s necessary. (Provided there’s a point in taking it down; the Wayback
Machine has archived some, but not all, of my blog.) For any opinion-pieces I
can no longer stand behind, I’ll write a generic disclaimer and post it to the
top. This task seems a little silly, but I’d rather be safe than sorry.
Second, I will be retiring this blog soon. I may post here a
few more times, but I won’t be here past April 15. Except, possibly, to
re-direct you to my new blog. If
there is one.
I do value blogging. It gives me a place and a chance to think
through things with an audience (even if mostly imagined) beyond whoever will
indulge me in real life. I can keep track of where I am with things. I’m having
trouble articulating I find so valuable in blogging, but those are close
enough. I don’t like blogging here anymore, though. I can’t bury this blog, and
I don’t want to; I feel I’ve done some good writing here in the last few years,
and I’d like to be able to link back to it if the occasion comes. What I want
is to a signal a break of some kind; I want a fresh-ish start.
(I’ve also learned some HTML and CSS, and the tiniest bit of
Javascript, so this might be a chance to make something for myself and not just
for an assignment.)
I need time to think about what shape that new blog would
take, though, or if I do want to go ahead with it. I don’t know what my life
will be like in the second half of April, let alone after that. I do know that
I’m having trouble finding time (or energy, motivation, etc.) to write the
fiction and poetry I want to write, and blogging takes up some of those
resources. There might be good reasons to stop blogging entirely for a while,
or scaling back, or changing my approach. I don’t know yet; I need to think
about it. But I’ve been meaning to
think about it for over two years now, and I never really do. I decided I need
to commit publicly to ending this blog in order to seriously think about
something new.
If I do start
something new, though, there will be an important change: I’ll be using my full
name. The Christian H persona has taken on the brunt of context
collapse so I don’t have to—I don’t think I’ve looked to avoid
accountability so much as avoid social awkwardness—but that strategy has a
shelf life and I’ve pushed it past reasonable limits.
4.
In the meantime, the Weekly Wonders tumblr will
still run at least until late May. I started late last May and since the start
I planned to take a hiatus at the anniversary. I’m not the only wonder-monger,
though, so it may continue without me; I’m also sure to pick it up again before
too long.
I’ll still have my other tumblr, too,
though it’s devolved into a reblog tumblr and I have no intention to make it
very much more than that.
You could also follow me around on Disqus. I’m going to be seriously
re-thinking my commenting practice, too, but I likely won’t stop entirely.
I would really
appreciate suggestions for a new blog, on any aspect of it; suggestions can
go in the comments or through e-mail, if you have an address. In particular, I'm thinking about what platform to use: Blogger, WordPress, and Tumblr all have advantages and disadvantages. Also, while I can look at the stats and see what kind of content gets traffic, I'd prefer to hear more qualitative assessments: what worked for you, what mattered to you, what you didn't understand. I can’t guarantee
I’ll take your advice, of course, but certainly I welcome input.
4 comments:
I would go for a Wordpress blog. In terms of CMS Wordpress is the gold standard today.
But why don't you try to have a channel over Patheos?
Well, I did send them an e-mail, and then a follow up one a few months later. They never got back to me. I took the hint.
This seems like a good opportunity to say thanks for your wonderful blog- your writing is always thoughtful and mind-expanding and I feel that reading this blog has helped me become a better person, at least in some small ways. Thank you!
I particularly enjoyed reading about morality, faith, and literature (Borges!) but would happily read whatever you care to write about in the future.
-Lauren
Lauren D., I'm sorry I took so long to reply! I'm grateful for your kind words and hope to see you at the new place when I get it up and running.
Christian H.
Post a Comment